Use your widget sidebars in the admin Design tab to change this little blurb here. Add the text widget to the Blurb Sidebar!
Home Commentary Metropolitan Spotlights Dashboard Data Maps Blog Subscribe to MetroTrends Blog - RSS RSS icon

Women's Health: A key link to understanding the US health disadvantage?

Author: Laudan Aron

| Posted: January 3rd, 2014

Last week, Wonkblog asked some “interesting, important and influential thinkers” to name their favorite graph of 2013. It was a thrill to learn that Emily Oster, an associate professor of economics at the University of Chicago Booth School, picked a figure from a study that I directed at the National Research Council (NRC) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM).

The graph shows that the United States is slipping further and further behind other high-income countries (mostly those in Western Europe, along with Canada, Australia, and Japan) on life expectancy at birth. The NRC/IOM report looked at the health of Americans through a cross-national prism and showed how we are losing ground across the board: on virtually every measure of morbidity and mortality, at all ages up to age 75, among all races and ethnicities, at all socioeconomic levels, and among both men and women. This large and growing “US health disadvantage,” as the NRC/IOM report calls it, has attracted widespread attention—ranging from a New York Times editorial to a commentary by Rush Limbaugh—since the report was released in January 2013. My own editorial views were published a few months later in the New Scientist and Slate.

As I considered the chart that Oster picked, I wondered if she shouldn’t have picked a slightly different and even more eye-popping figure from our report (and it should be noted that both figures come from a prior related study that inspired our study). This figure shows the probability of women in high-income countries surviving to age 50. As with the Oster figure, the United States is shown in red and the other high-income countries are shown in grey:

Probability of survival to age 50 for females in 21 high-income countries, 1980-2006

women1

The graph shows that US women are less likely to reach age 50 than women in other advanced countries. We are a true outlier in this case. A more recent analysis by scholars at the University of Wisconsin–Madison shows that in many places across the country, mortality among women is actually worsening. In the decade between 1992-96 and 2002-06, female mortality rates actually increased in 42.8 percent of US counties. Here is a map of those counties:

Change in female mortality rates from 1992–96 to 2002–06 in US counties

women2

We really need to get a handle on what’s going on here. As the Urban Institute digs into the social determinants of health in an effort to better understand the US health disadvantage, a key part of this work will be exploring the many drivers of women’s health. Our preliminary analyses suggest that increases in mortality are especially pronounced among white women of reproductive age, not a group we generally think of as being disadvantaged. And finally, because women’s health (and survival) directly affects children and families, we will be looking at their well-being too.

Filed under: Health and Health Policy, Maternal and child health, Other, Public health, Social determinants of health |Tags: , , , , ,
5 Comments »

5 Comments on “Women's Health: A key link to understanding the US health disadvantage?”

  1. 1 MLR said at 7:59 pm on January 3rd, 2014:

    If the US had universal healthcare (single payer) for the past 30 yrs, we wouldn’t be lagging so pathetically & tragically behind in life expectancy for all our citizens compared to other industrialized countries.

  2. 2 Johnson said at 11:04 am on January 5th, 2014:

    And yet women still outlive men. Perhaps the focus needs to be on why men do not live as long.

  3. 3 Denise Henning said at 6:41 am on January 8th, 2014:

    The increase in mortality rates among childbearing women can be directly tied to the inappropriate use of cesarean section. When used appropriately, cesareans can save lives. But when the average C/S rate for LOW risk, first time Moms is over 32% nationwide (and as high as 50% in some hospitals), something is gravely wrong. Women deserve better.

  4. 4 Maureen said at 12:25 am on January 12th, 2014:

    We Canadians have a similar life style and diet to Americans, but we have 2big differences: a national health care system & gun control. I’d like to see the stats for both countries compared.

  5. 5 Top Five on Friday: January 17 | YWCA USA Blog said at 2:28 pm on January 17th, 2014:

    [...] lack the strong social networks and sense of purpose that have shown to reduce mortality. At the Metrotrends Urban Institute blog, Aron writes, ‘Our preliminary analyses suggest that increases in mortality are especially [...]


Leave a Reply